Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id JAA20182 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 09:28:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA004436242; Tue, 5 Mar 1996 06:30:42 -0800
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 06:30:42 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <199603051409.KAA02023@Fox.nstn.ca>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: "Chris Purdie" <topher@fox.nstn.ca>
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: You Can't Put A Price On Some Information
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
> can't believe how many people believe the $60 price is too high. I really
> believe everyone knows that it is a realistic, competitive price but they are
> trying to "haggle" the makers down if they can. Everyone knows that other
> lightwave tapes cost about $50 each. Books about Lightwave cost that much, a
> subscription to Lightwave Pro and Video Toaster User combined cost that much,
> and yes, tutorial tapes cost that much. The $60 is a fair price: nice effort
> to get them to come down though.
I don't think the $60 is to high... I mean come on.. the guy has to make
some money! Now, if it is only costing him $5 per tape, then I would